Funded Trading Plus vs SabioTrade (2026) — Which Is Better?

Compare Funded Trading Plus and SabioTrade — features, pricing, pros and cons.

Numbers, fees, and platform capabilities cited here come from each vendor's public documentation. Confirm current pricing before you commit. Methodology →

Quick Verdict

Higher Rated

Funded Trading Plus (4.4)

More Affordable

Funded Trading Plus ($119/mo)

Funded Trading Plus

★★★★★ 4.4/5

UK-based prop firm founded in 2013 offering instant funding and evaluation programs with up to 100% profit splits, 5 trading platforms, and $19.5M+ paid out to 60,000+ traders worldwide.

From: $119/mo
Full review →

SabioTrade

★★★★☆ 3.8/5

SabioTrade is a prop trading firm offering a simplified 1-step evaluation with funded accounts up to $650K, weekly payouts, and 90% profit splits.

From: $119/mo
Full review →

Rules, Payout & Fee Breakdown

Feature Funded Trading Plus SabioTrade
Rating 4.4 3.8
Starting Price $119/mo $119/mo
Free Tier No No
Markets forex, indices, commodities, crypto forex, stocks, indices, commodities, crypto, etfs
AI Analysis
Backtesting
Paper Trading
Price Alerts
Mobile App
API Access
Social Features
Broker Integration
Custom Indicators
Automated Trading
Trade Journaling
Performance Analytics
Risk Management
News Feed
Education Content

Prop-Firm Head-to-Head

How Each One Plays

Funded Trading Plus and SabioTrade are both regulated prop trading firms offering funded accounts to retail traders, but they take fundamentally different approaches to trader onboarding and profit scaling. Funded Trading Plus targets traders seeking aggressive growth with multiple scaling paths and platform flexibility, while SabioTrade appeals to traders prioritizing speed to funded capital and simplified evaluation mechanics. Both charge $119/month, making pricing neutral in this decision.

What You Actually Pay

Both firms charge an identical base assessment fee of $119/month, but the cost structure diverges significantly beyond this headline number.

Funded Trading Plus uses a tiered entry model tied to account size. A trader paying $119 unlocks access to evaluation programs, but the actual funded account requires additional commitment based on the scaling tier selected. The firm offers multiple entry points with up to $2.5 million in potential capital allocation through their growth program, meaning a successful trader can reinvest profits to access larger accounts without additional assessment fees.

SabioTrade charges the same $119 but includes a critical guarantee: the assessment fee is fully refunded after your first profitable payout. This means if you pass evaluation and generate profit within your first month, you recover the entire $119. For traders confident in their ability to profit immediately, SabioTrade's refund structure effectively eliminates entry cost, while Funded Trading Plus keeps the fee regardless of performance.

SabioTrade also advertises weekly payouts arriving within 24 hours, though Trustpilot reviews indicate inconsistency here. Funded Trading Plus doesn't specify payout frequency in their public materials, suggesting longer intervals. Neither firm charges withdrawal fees based on the provided data.

Winner for value: SabioTrade, if you profit immediately; Funded Trading Plus, if you value scaling flexibility over initial cost recovery.

Capability Contrast

Evaluation Structure: Funded Trading Plus requires traders to complete their evaluation program before receiving funded capital, though they offer an "instant funding" option skipping the evaluation entirely. SabioTrade uses a simplified 1-step evaluation instead of the industry-standard 2-phase challenge, cutting evaluation time roughly in half. For traders with limited patience or capital preservation concerns during testing, SabioTrade's single-step process reduces exposure and decision fatigue. Funded Trading Plus's instant funding option levels this advantage only if you're willing to skip evaluation entirely.

Profit Splits and Scaling: This is the decisive differentiator. Funded Trading Plus offers up to 100% profit splits through their growth program, meaning top performers keep all trading gains beyond a breakeven threshold. Splits scale based on account performance and trading history. SabioTrade caps profit splits at 90% on accounts $100K and above, with lower splits on smaller accounts. A trader generating $10,000 profit keeps $10,000 at Funded Trading Plus (at max tier) versus $9,000 at SabioTrade—a material difference at scale.

Account Scaling: Funded Trading Plus explicitly supports accounts up to $2.5 million through their growth program, allowing traders to reinvest profits into larger allocated capitals. SabioTrade's maximum account size is $650K with no scaling path mentioned. A trader wanting to reach $2M in capital must choose Funded Trading Plus; SabioTrade caps growth at $650K.

Platform Support: Funded Trading Plus integrates five trading platforms including cTrader and DXTrade, giving traders platform choice flexibility. SabioTrade's platform support isn't detailed, suggesting fewer options. For traders with platform-specific strategies or preferences, Funded Trading Plus's five-platform support is substantially better.

Education: SabioTrade includes free education and mentorship for all traders as standard. Funded Trading Plus emphasizes backtesting and AI analysis tools but doesn't highlight structured education in the provided specs. New traders or those seeking guided learning benefit from SabioTrade's inclusion; experienced traders won't miss it.

Trustworthiness: Funded Trading Plus holds a 4.7/5 Trustpilot rating with 24/7 support explicitly mentioned. SabioTrade scores 3.8/5, with reported payout disputes and slow customer support response times. A 0.9-point gap on Trustpilot, particularly with payout issues cited, suggests Funded Trading Plus manages trader expectations and delivery more consistently.

Who Should Choose Funded Trading Plus

- Traders targeting six-figure+ profits: The 100% profit split and $2.5M scaling ceiling mean a trader aiming to grow from $100K to $2M in capital will retain substantially more earnings than at SabioTrade. This compounds significantly over years.

- Platform-flexible strategists: Traders using cTrader, DXTrade, or niche platforms need access to multiple execution venues. Funded Trading Plus supports five platforms explicitly; SabioTrade's constraints would force strategy adaptation.

- Traders prioritizing firm reliability: The 4.7/5 vs 3.8/5 Trustpilot gap and reported payout issues at SabioTrade indicate higher operational risk. Risk-averse traders, particularly those with large funded accounts, should weight SabioTrade's lower rating seriously.

- Experienced traders skipping evaluation: The "instant funding" option without evaluation appeals to traders with years of track record seeking immediate capital deployment without time spent on testing. SabioTrade's faster evaluation doesn't match skipping it entirely.

Who Should Choose SabioTrade

- Speed-focused traders wanting funding immediately: The 1-step evaluation cuts time-to-funding roughly in half compared to traditional 2-phase challenges. A trader wanting funded capital within days, not weeks, benefits from simplified onboarding.

- Traders with limited capital wanting fee recovery: The $119 assessment refund after first profit payout appeals to undercapitalized traders. If you're confident you'll profit in the first month, SabioTrade effectively charges zero upfront fees.

- Newer traders seeking guidance: Free education and mentorship included at SabioTrade provide structured learning absent from Funded Trading Plus. A trader transitioning from demo to live funded trading benefits from this support.

- Traders with $100K–$650K in target capital: If your scaling goal is $650K or below, SabioTrade's 90% profit split versus Funded Trading Plus's structure on equivalent accounts is nearly identical. You avoid Trustpilot rating risk without sacrificing earnings.

How to Choose

Funded Trading Plus wins for serious traders targeting multiple millions in scaled capital and maximum profit retention; the 100% profit split at scale and $2.5M ceiling create substantially higher ceiling earnings than SabioTrade's $650K cap and 90% split. SabioTrade wins for traders prioritizing speed-to-funding, fee recovery through refund structure, and guided education, provided you can tolerate slower customer support and accept Trustpilot's lower rating. Choose Funded Trading Plus if you're optimizing for long-term scaling and earning power; choose SabioTrade if you need funded capital immediately and want upfront costs eliminated through performance-based refunds.

Funded Trading Plus: Pros & Cons

Pros

  • + Instant funding option with no evaluation phase required
  • + Profit splits scalable up to 100% with growth program
  • + Five supported trading platforms including cTrader and DXTrade
  • + Scaling path up to $2.5 million in funded capital
  • + Strong 4.7/5 Trustpilot rating with 24/7 customer support

Cons

  • - Higher entry fees compared to some competing prop firms
  • - No dedicated mobile app — relies on broker platform apps
  • - All instruments are CFDs, no direct access to stocks or futures
  • - Strict rule enforcement post-evaluation reported by some traders

SabioTrade: Pros & Cons

Pros

  • + Simplified 1-step evaluation — no 2-phase challenge required
  • + Weekly payouts typically arriving within 24 hours
  • + Assessment fee fully refunded after first profit payout
  • + 90% profit split on accounts $100K and above
  • + Free education and mentorship included for all traders

Cons

  • - Payout disputes reported by some traders on Trustpilot
  • - Customer support can be slow to resolve payment issues
  • - No scaling plans available to grow funded account size
  • - Futures trading not supported

Guides & Tutorials

More on This

Try Funded Trading Plus

Visit Funded Trading Plus →

Try SabioTrade

Visit SabioTrade →

Related Comparisons

Some links on this page are affiliate links. If you sign up through them, we may earn a commission at no extra cost to you — that's what keeps this site free.