FTMO vs FXIFY (2026) — Which Is Better?

Compare FTMO and FXIFY — features, pricing, pros and cons.

Numbers, fees, and platform capabilities cited here come from each vendor's public documentation. Confirm current pricing before you commit. Methodology →

Official FTMO source → Official FXIFY source → Data checked through 2026-03-31.

Quick Verdict

Higher Rated

FTMO (4.5)

More Affordable

FXIFY ($59/mo)

FTMO

★★★★★ 4.5/5

The most established proprietary trading firm offering funded accounts up to $200K after a two-phase evaluation, with 90% profit splits.

From: $155/mo
Full review →

FXIFY

★★★★☆ 4.1/5

Broker-backed prop firm offering 1-step, 2-step, and 3-step evaluations with 300+ instruments, EA support, and payouts within 3 business days.

From: $59/mo
Full review →

Rules, Payout & Fee Breakdown

Feature FTMO FXIFY
Rating 4.5 4.1
Starting Price $155/mo $59/mo
Free Tier Yes No
Markets forex, stocks, crypto, futures forex, crypto, indices, commodities, futures
AI Analysis
Backtesting
Paper Trading
Price Alerts
Mobile App
API Access
Social Features
Broker Integration
Custom Indicators
Automated Trading
Trade Journaling
Performance Analytics
Risk Management
News Feed
Education Content

Prop-Firm Head-to-Head

## Overview

FTMO and FXIFY represent two distinct approaches to proprietary trading funding: FTMO (4.5/5 rating) is the industry veteran with a strict two-phase evaluation gauntlet leading to accounts up to $200K with a legendary 90% profit split, while FXIFY (4.1/5 rating) is the nimble newcomer backed by FXPIG's actual brokerage infrastructure, offering flexible 1-3 step evaluations and access to 300+ instruments including 80+ crypto CFDs. Your choice between them depends less on which is "better" and more on whether you value established credibility and maximum profit payouts or flexibility, lower entry costs, and broker-backed authenticity.

## Pricing Comparison

FXIFY wins on entry price: $59/month versus FTMO's $155/month—a 62% cost difference. However, this gap narrows when you factor in add-ons. FXIFY's base price grants 70% profit split; upgrading to 80% or 90% split requires optional add-ons that push monthly costs toward $100+. FTMO's $155/month flat fee locks in the 90% split with zero à la carte charges. Neither offers a free tier, but FTMO provides a genuinely free trial to test the platform before committing funds—a risk-reduction mechanism FXIFY lacks. FTMO refunds your challenge fee on your first profitable payout, reducing effective cost for successful traders. FXIFY's challenge fees start at $59 but scale with account size ($249 for $100K accounts), while Instant Funding options cost substantially more without the payoff guarantee. For a trader planning 3-6 challenges before success, FXIFY's per-attempt cost is lower; for someone confident in passing on attempt one or two, FTMO's flat-rate structure and fee refund become economically superior.

## Key Features Head-to-Head

**Profit Split & Payouts:** FTMO's 90% split is unmatched in the industry and compounds over time—on a $10K monthly profit, you pocket $9,000 versus $8,000 with FXIFY's standard 80%. FTMO pays biweekly; FXIFY processes withdrawals within 3 business days, which is marginally faster operationally but less predictable for recurring income planning.

**Evaluation Structure:** FTMO's two-phase evaluation is a higher bar—you must pass Phase 1 profit targets, then Phase 2 with stricter drawdown rules. FXIFY's 1-3 step options let you choose your difficulty, making it more accessible to inconsistent traders but less credential-meaningful. FXIFY's broker-backed model means trades execute on real FXPIG infrastructure; FTMO's evaluation environment is sophisticated but simulated, which some traders perceive as less "real."

**Strategy Support:** FXIFY explicitly supports EAs, martingale systems, grid trading, and news scalping—strategies many prop firms ban. FTMO's restrictions on trading styles aren't explicitly detailed but historically have been stricter. If you trade algorithmic or grid-based systems, FXIFY removes friction; FTMO may disqualify you.

**Platform & Instruments:** FTMO offers MT4, MT5, and cTrader across all accounts—three industry standards. FXIFY defaults to MT4/MT5 with DXTrade as a crypto-focused alternative. FTMO's instrument library is institution-grade; FXIFY's 300+ instruments plus 80+ crypto CFDs caters specifically to crypto and index traders. Neither has a standout mobile app—both rely on brokers' native mobile clients.

**Scaling Capacity:** FTMO maxes out at $200K per account; scaling requires purchasing additional accounts separately (compounding costs). FXIFY scales to $4M in simulated capital within a single evaluation path, reducing friction if you prove yourself quickly.

## Who Should Choose FTMO

- **Established traders with consistent 3-month histories:** You've already proven your strategy works; FTMO's two-phase gauntlet will sting briefly, but the 90% split compounds fast. The $155/month is a rounding error against $7-10K+ monthly profits.

- **Traders prioritizing profit maximization over flexibility:** You trade one proven style, don't experiment, and value the industry's best split. FTMO's drawdown rules are strict, but they align with money-management discipline you already practice.

- **Traders seeking credibility and longevity:** FTMO's track record spans years; funded accounts are real leverage against institutional brokers. If you're building a long-term prop trading career, FTMO's pedigree opens doors.

- **MT4/MT5/cTrader exclusive users:** If your entire workflow is built on these platforms, FTMO's native support eliminates integration friction that might cost you trades.

## Who Should Choose FXIFY

- **Algorithmic and systematic traders:** EAs, grids, martingales, and news scalping aren't forbidden—they're expected. If your edge is automated, FXIFY's explicit support saves you months of platform-hunting.

- **Traders experimenting with crypto or exotic instruments:** The 80+ crypto CFDs and 300+ total instruments mean you can test emerging markets under prop funding rather than personal capital. FTMO's crypto exposure is minimal.

- **Cost-conscious traders in evaluation phase:** At $59/month per attempt, you can afford 2-3 failed evaluations and still stay under FTMO's baseline. The lower per-attempt burn rate reduces risk if your strategy needs refinement.

- **Traders seeking "real broker" infrastructure:** FXPIG's actual brokerage backend appeals to those skeptical of simulated evaluation environments. You're not gaming a trading game; you're trading on genuine market infrastructure.

## The Verdict

Choose **FTMO** if you're a proven trader maximizing income—the 90% split and established reputation justify the $155 monthly fee, and you'll recoup it within weeks of consistent profitability. Choose **FXIFY** if you're still optimizing your strategy, trade algorithms or crypto, or need cost-effective evaluation attempts—the $59 entry and flexible scaling let you prove yourself cheaply before committing to FTMO-grade capital. FTMO is the trophy you've earned; FXIFY is the training ground you need.

FTMO: Pros & Cons

Pros

  • + Industry-leading 90% profit split with no hidden conditions
  • + Free Trial with unlimited retakes lets you test before spending money
  • + Challenge fee fully refunded on your first successful payout
  • + Supports 4 platforms: MT4, MT5, cTrader, and DXtrade
  • + Built-in performance analytics and journaling tools rival standalone apps
  • + Decade of operations and $500M+ in verified payouts — real credibility

Cons

  • - 85-95% estimated failure rate means most traders lose their challenge fees
  • - Non-refundable fees add up fast — 3 failed $50K attempts costs over $1,000
  • - Strict 5% daily drawdown can end your challenge on one bad day
  • - Simulated trading only — your trades never reach real markets
  • - Customer complaints about harsh rule enforcement on edge cases

FXIFY: Pros & Cons

Pros

  • + Broker-backed model via FXPIG provides real brokerage infrastructure, not purely simulated
  • + Supports all major trading strategies including EAs, martingale, grid, and news trading
  • + Competitive evaluation fees starting at $59 with four distinct challenge formats
  • + 80+ cryptocurrency CFDs with dedicated crypto trading plans
  • + Scaling up to $4M in simulated capital with 3-business-day payouts

Cons

  • - Founded in 2023 — limited long-term track record compared to established firms
  • - No dedicated mobile app; relies entirely on MT4/MT5 or DXTrade mobile
  • - Optional add-ons (90% split, bi-weekly payouts, leverage boost) can significantly increase total cost
  • - Instant Funding fees are substantially higher than challenge-based alternatives

Guides & Tutorials

Related Pages

You Might Also Compare

Some links on this page are affiliate links. If you sign up through them, we may earn a commission at no extra cost to you — that's what keeps this site free.